New productive arrangements and greater dissemination of science

New emerging arrangements of a new productive chain based on applied science. But for that, a greater dissemination of science is still needed. How much do bioscience profits lose annually due to lack of disclosure? Questions like: how much does the life sciences lose annually in knowledge, advancement and income due to lack of popularity? These issues point to the complexity of the production chain that worsens as we move forward in time. An example of the results of the popularization of science is the increase in the action of biohackers and the innovation potential of this alternative movement. There are already people via DIY Biohackers editing genes via CRISPR and other techniques at alternative sites. Even doing high-level research with this high-level science disclosure. We are still in the generation of this movement, with its own methods, concepts and forms of action in a global network, but with actions that are already very advanced.

In the cities, the outside world we see more and more residences and less industry, something that is becoming rare to find. Something worrisome in a way, especially for those who need to work. In many cases, a phenomenon was produced by real estate speculation, which expels industrial parks to give rise to new models, sometimes sustainable and sometimes not. However, something more trivial and like an interior-destroying bacterium is killing more industries than the competition for space. It is the digital issue, which little by little is engulfing the industries towards new models, a fact that will not be broken down in this article but that is already happening since an ERP to a digital production system present new ways of working that dispossessed the old ways of working . Turning human thought and reasoning into a chimera of a dispossessed trade. And there is no turning back! Industrial models languish to an absurdly incomprehensible efficiency within the reach of human capabilities. The question of that automation seen in Japan by microtechnology in the 70s, 80s, 90s is already outdated. We are already in a model far beyond, a model that completely discards the human being, both in production and in projects. This is a completely aggressive production model, following the digital and no longer the human question. So the question of killing industry jobs is a matter of time. And since there is no work in the industries, things are going to get complicated in the world.

For this, the only way out is to invest more in complex science, through new arrangements and low-cost methods, as well as the possibility of outsourcing and renting high-cost methods. That is, the relocation of former high-level industry workers into these new arrangements would be a possibility. With the intention of questioning a greater interdisciplinarity in tissue engineering, including taking this knowledge, its bases, terms and methods to mechanical and chemical engineering of meshes.

So everyone needs to have a high-capacity lab with high-cost equipment, instruments, and supplies if all of this can go from passive to active and profitable. If there is the greatest popularization of the sciences, and open access by rental, outsourcing or other commercial arrangements, that laboratory could be paid for, which only generated costs. The outsourcing of analytical services, the association with schools, universities, companies and even with researchers, can present new arrangements for a new productive matrix that is based in the world.

In this same line of reasoning, an article was issued on the dissemination of Biosciences through an initial basic method, for people in general interested in starting in this branch. The question that was posed would be: Where is Hello World for life sciences? A return to the beginnings of advanced research is also necessary. In particular, highly efficient forms of industrialized research. As we can see in the brilliant work of Thomas Hager – The Demon Under the Microscope. The remedies from the famous Salvarsan to the maximum effectiveness of the pharmaco-chemicals at present, there are many details that can be noted in the book. The way those doctors and doctors carried out their research. Like Mr. Gerhard Domagk and others.

However, in most countries, there is a constraint on gene manipulation, as there will be progress in this environment if this knowledge is kept indoors and out of reach. Regenerative engineering as a means to bring the world to a new technological level is a historic milestone. The feat of the computer hacker is just one example of how far we can go with the popularization of biosciences. Deregulation and freedom are what progress brings. Securitized environments have proven to be less efficient overall, making them a highly informed block environment.

How far can we go with the popularization of genetic techniques, biosciences in general and the cost savings of the necessary materials? This is a problem that is being exposed by the biohacking movement. We are talking about a new oxygenation of old applications, a new brainstorm, much more than applications with PCR, chromatography, physical and chemical techniques in general, and even CRISPR. We talk about the involvement of creativity, logic, computing in this environment, and even other disciplines. In general, generating what does not exist, creating more efficient means to carry out tests, devices, characterizations and specifications. More efficient and more productive means, things that don’t even exist.

One of the issues raised by the author on the topic of the importance of popularizing the biosciences involves the issue of the notorious biohacking movement. Although for some it is an “amateur” movement, what would they say about “hackers”, those who have already dismantled highly professional IT structures? Therefore, the question that the author poses for the popularization of biosciences involves the generation of an initial step, like Hello World in logic programming. So where is Hello World for life sciences? It would be popularizing alternative methods, supplies or equipment with KITs, or popularizing PCR, making CRISPR more clear and accessible, and facilitating access to complete KITs. In addition to providing open access to large laboratories for students and enthusiasts, for high-level equipment. In addition to other possibilities, the brainstorming gain that will result from this popularization is undeniable. Include, the possibilities of the biohacking movement to gain potential and growth to the level of being compared to the computer hacker movement. Anyone who doubts, just study what computers were like in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and see billions of real closed labs. However, with popularization, customization, and free access to hardware and other advances, the benefits achieved are notorious. The question of DNA and the cataloging of what each protein does, in particular for the control of CRISPR, are indications that in a few decades biological structures will be highly controlled and artificial tissues will be mere spare parts. Undoubtedly, the advancement in the field of biosciences only tends to be lost without further popularization.

Jobs involving complex and even dangerous media, such as biology, will be both a challenge for the biohacker and a means to hone skills. Select an agent, a medium and a system, consider the safe means of working with a closed area. Something like a return to the beginnings of the investigation, sometimes blindly, but with the advantage of having models in the news. Therefore, every biohacker is recommended to read two essential works. One Lehninger – principles of biochemistry and the other Thomas Hager – The devil under the microscope. With this initial foundation, along with hacker action concepts, there’s no way there wouldn’t be a lot going on in this environment, forming the first action platforms for biohacking movements.

This popularization of science will result in new productive arrangements for the new economy. They are new work concepts, even to take advantage of innovation by alternative means. These new actions by agents outside the official status quo can generate new openings for new economic arrangements, among them. One case is the possibility of improving new technologies for micro/nanomanufacturing, which can complement biohacking actions with nanotechnologies. These new arrangements can generate great potential in a global collaborative network to solve complex problems, with bureaucracies, and especially to circumvent local restrictions on research. The new economy has begun, whether or not governments want their bureaucracies, progress is underway.